My grandmother, Dora Gregory, about 1910, and I made tonight’s dinner—oven-fried chicken and mashed potatoes—thinking of her. Her fried chicken, although I only had it a few times, was divine. It was what I’d call Border State Fried rather than Southern Fried—no batter, but the pieces sprinkled with top-secret seasonings and then coated in flour.

I remember that there would be a bunch of salads–macaroni and fruit, I think, and one made with hominy, and vegetable casseroles, with green beans a favorite, liberally flavored with bacon, sweet potatoes laced with butter and brown sugar—it’s a wonder I’m not dead yet.

(There would also have been, irrelevant as it may seem, sliced ham. Her ham deserves a whole separate post. Her husband, my grandfather John, raised hogs; slaughtering, curing and smoking happened in winter and whole families would participate, moving from one neighbor’s Ozark Plateau farm to another until all the hams were hung. It would’ve been a dreadful time of year to be a hog.)

Of course, Grandmother’s crowning glory, and even the chicken took a little bit of a back seat, was her mashed potatoes, fluffy as clouds. The chicken cracklings and their lubricant would be turned, through some kind of sorcery, into flour gravy ladled over the potatoes, with a little crater in their midst. But I thought that since her mashed potatoes were so good, the gravy was better used over biscuits.

(I like to think that my grandmother would love my mashed taters. Here they are.)

This was in Taft, so it must have been insufferably hot to cook.

The older men ate with linen napkins tucked into their shirt collars; finger-licking was forgiven. All that food would be washed down with iced tea and then the men would take naps while the women kept working.

Many of the men, of course, would someday die of coronary arrest. So it goes.

Then there was dessert. Some of those men, in their last moments, dreamed of lemon meringue pie. That may have been the vision that got them over to the Other Side.

I will be the first to admit that I’m a very emotional person: anger, sadness, delight, despair, outrage. I got ’em all. So that’s how I taught, I guess.

It wasn’t enough for my history kids to “know the material.” I wanted them to feel sadness (Wounded Knee), delight (the detail in “Phiz’s” drawings for Dickens’s works), despair (Auschwitz-Birkenau), outrage (The Triangle Shirtwaist Fire). So my classes always carried the freight of my personality.

My personality was a product of and a tribute to my Dad, who grew up in the Depression Ozarks,  who grew up to become the most amazing storyteller I’ve ever known, and my Mom, of Irish descent, fiercely spiritual and fine-tuned to injustice. She never forgave Germany for the Holocaust (overlooking the fact that some of her ancestry was from Baden-Wurttemberg) and she constantly modeled respect for others, which led to the five-year-old me carrying a gallon wine-jug full of cold water to the braceros working the fields alongside our house.

They were marvelous teachers. I had stern but also marvelous teachers in my two-room country school, Branch Elementary, in the Upper Arroyo Grande Valley. My big sister was a teacher. College further corrupted me because it threw even more amazing teachers at me: at Missouri, Charles B. Dew on the History of the American South, David Bienvenu, the History of Socialist Thought, Winfield J. Burggraaff, Latin American History, David Thelen, American Populism and Progressivism; at Poly, Dan Krieger, European History (his lectures were so vivid that I’d forget to take notes) and Robert Burton, East Asian History.

I was doomed.

It took awhile, but I became a teacher—a history teacher, and what could be more useless than that?—for thirty years.

I accumulated some favorite lessons along the way: re-enacting the Estates-General in 1789 and JFK’s ExComm during the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962; teaching Art History as  fundamental to understanding European History; teaching Relativity Theory by momentarily disappearing from the classroom and returning younger than they were; using battlefield archaeology to hit them to the bone about the inhumanity of the First World War, introducing them to a high-school classmate they’d never know because he was killed on Arizona on December 7 or helping them to understand the alienation of the 1920s by reading Hemingway (“Cat in the Rain” or “In Another Country”) to them aloud. I loved reading to them.

There is no place for nonsense like this in Modern Pedagogy, which, based on my admittedly faulty understanding, consists of enclosing students in a Skinner Box and then beating the box repeatedly with a baseball bat.

That’s what they want us to do, those Educational Theorists, who, to paraphrase George C. Scott’s speech in Patton, (Scott was a dropout from my Alma Mater, the University of Missouri), probably know less about teaching than they do about fornication.

Here is some of what we endured as teachers during my time in education, which is why the part I miss about education is closing the door once the bell rings and the shock, which never quite goes away, of realizing that you are responsible for thirty-two teenagers. That was a happy moment, that realization. So I miss the children. There is nothing else I miss about education.

No Child Left Behind.  Back in its day, we were told, solemnly and without flinching, by a district administrator that it was the goal for every child in the district to pass the state exams within ten years.

Every child.

No exceptions.

I raised my hand–because I have a big mouth–and allowed, in front of 150 people, that this kind of idealism was a mite less than realistic. There was a shocked silence. A stern correction of my disbelief followed that should have eased my mind and put me in my place.

It didn’t. It began to occur to me that the people who make up the ranks of what might be called Educational Leadership are, in fact, insane, every bit as nuts as the World War II commanders who recruited kamikaze pilots.

The single most offensive line I have ever heard from a District Superintendent: “I am a data-driven kind of guy.” (So my lesson, the one that demanded that my students make up a livable family budget during the Great Depression, was heresy. It wasn’t data-driven.) He didn’t last long, but he  was replaced by another data-driven guy, one who would have joyfully flown the kamikaze plane himself: 100% of those kids are going to pass those damned standardized tests.

Integrated Teaching. We had a special inservice (“Inservice” is a special educational term for a day when you and your peers are locked in an airless room and psychologically abused for eight hours, with young eager teachers, like the kapos at Auschwitz, monitoring your progress) on interdisciplinary teaching—in theory, a dandy idea. It made wonderful sense for them to be reading Scott Fitzgerald in English and learning about bootlegging in history, for example. But the charming conceit of this idea was corrupted into the requirement that we be in absolute lockstep with each other, that we had to teach Gatsby and bootlegging on the exact same day, and that day had to be February 16, and not being at that point on that day could only mean one thing: You were a terrible teacher and possibly a pervert and a communist.

Outcome-based Education. This one was a whopper, and it had the longest shelf life.  Basically it meant that a student could not progress until she had passed the unit test. So she would be given the unit test over and over and over and over and over until she passed. This led to one of the few times I got not only frustrated but genuinely nasty with a student in the classroom.

“What would you like for your fortieth birthday?” I asked him.

“Huh?” he asked.

“Because you’re still going to be here.”

Wag the Dog.  The state testing got so overwhelming and pernicious that it was decided that the History Department would spend at least four inservices (see above: stress airlessness and psychological abuse) picking our way through a massive bank of state-generated multiple-choice questions (What kind of person writes multiple-choice history questions for a living? In what State Prison must they be doing time, and for how many homicides?), choosing the ones we liked and assembling them into unit tests, quarter tests and semester finals.

It was excruciating. My Grandmother Gregory was a delegate to the 1924 Democratic Convention at Madison Square Garden. It was a sweltering summer. It took the Democrats 105 ballots and five weeks to nominate John W. Davis, who would not only be trounced by Calvin Coolidge but whose only other notable contribution to American History would be arguing against Brown v. Board in front of the Supreme Court. So this was like the 1924 Democratic Convention.

Once we’d assembled our batteries of test questions, here was the strategy:

At the beginning of the unit (say, “America in the 1920s,”) we give the the test:

24. The Scopes Trial in Tennessee in July 1925 was focused on

A. The constitutionality of the death penalty

B. Due process for immigrants suspected of radicalism

C. Teaching the theory of evolution in schools

D. Klan activities in the 1920s South

Then we would give them the answers to the test.

Then we’d teach the unit.

Then we’d give them the exact same test.

When their scores improved from the first to the second test, we had made our point, pedagogically speaking. Learning had taken place.

I was flabbergasted.

So I continued to tell my students stories, to make them, whenever I could, live the history and feel the history.  I wasn’t the only one, either—many of my friends, some who still teach at places like AGHS, which is a wonderful school  because of them, were doing the same, like Reformation Christians in Henry VIII’s England with their English Bibles tucked behind a brick in the fireplace mantle.

Even in Catholic schools—and one of the things I always valued about Catholic education was its thoughtful disconnect from trendy pedagogy and its ethical underpinning (Jesus is such a fine role model), so poorly modeled by the church hierarchy—teachers are being bombarded by the latest in educational theory.

By the way, the Germans announced their presence in Poland with Stuka dive-bombers. The latest in educational theory appears in acronyms.

The answer is C.

Now, tell me how your great-great-grandmother felt when your great-great-grandfather lost his job in 1931.  Show me your grandfather’s photograph from Vietnam in 1967. Tell me about where you came from and why you are here. Tell me about the people you most admire. Tell me why you admire them. Tell me how evil presents itself and tell me about the tricks that charlatans use to lead whole nations astray.

Tell me about the kind of person you want to be someday.

You are sixteen years old. This is what you should know about history. This is what you need to learn. Tell me.

This is my Baby Dad. The 100th anniversary of his birth is July 31, so we are wondering what we should eat to celebrate his memory. Since he grew up on the Ozark Plateau, some of the potential dishes:

–Chicken-fried steak. I haven’t had chicken-fried steak in thirty-five years. The last time I tried it, it was so good that I only noticed momentarily that my arteries were slamming shut like the WalMart electric doors at closing time Black Friday.

–Ham-hocks and Lima beans. Nope. Lima beans are the only culinary abomination I find more disturbing than kale. Their interiors have the texture of beach sand and taste the same. Lima beans deserve to be extinct, like Dodo birds and Tea Party Republicans. Kale, by the way, reminds me of concertina wire.

–Squirrel stew. Not bad. A little peppery when Dad made it, about as bony as a Lake Trout but darker and more mysterious in flavor. Not for me: The squirrels around here, I assume, are all rabid and homicidal. The ones who aren’t carry the Plague bacillus.

–Missouri fried chicken. Not as batter-y as Southern Fried chicken. Dust it with either corn meal or flour, add Secret Spices, fry, inhale. Grandma Gregory’s Missouri fried drumsticks were divine, so good that we almost forgot she used to absently whack us with her cane. She’d been a country schoolteacher, you see, and whacking then was what refer to now as “Classroom Management.”

My grandmother, about 1910, in one of her sunny moods.

–A full-out Ham Dinner, with accompaniments, but it requires a table at least twelve feet long. And an immensity of hams. Fruit salad, potato salad, hot German potato salad, jello salad, macaroni salad, mounds of deviled eggs, cinnamoned yams grown in the Old Confederacy but invaded by melting Yankee marshmallows, biscuits smeared generously with butter melted in honey, string-bean casserole, mashed potatoes that remind you of fluffy clouds–if we could somehow get butter up there–and so many pies that another table is required just for them: Sweet potato pie, pumpkin pie, Dutch apple pie, chocolate pie, lemon meringue pie, peach pie and, most of all, pecan pie, with the “can” in “pecan” pronounced the way you’d pronounce it in the term “tin can.”

Also, the emphasis is emphatic on the first syllable in the words “July” and “insurance” and you go to see a movie at the “thee-AY-ter.”

In defense of the Ozark Plateau, a meal like this Meal of Many Hams is intended to reinforce ideals like Family and Community, and it’s eaten in several shifts that are interspersed with funny stories, family stories, local scandals, livestock inspection–Ozarkers love horses, and love commenting on them, as much as County Wicklow Irish do–neighborhood walks to work the food off where the neighbors wave from the front porch. Afterward, for folks my age, there are pleasant naps in rockers on those front porches while the kids screamed at Badminton to the Death on the back back lawn, because yards in the Border States and the tier of states below were and are immense and fenceless. They make you wonder, with all that room and neighborly welcome, why Fort Sumter ever happened.

My Grandfather, John Gregory, born in Kentucky in 1862, the second year of the Civil War. The appropriate term for me is “Older Than Dirt.”

–Here’s the favorite potential Celebrate Dad meal so far, and it’s intended for breakfast: BISCUITS AND GRAVY, with a creamy gravy studded with nougats du pork and sided by fried (Do you notice a pattern here? Teenaged Dad brought grapefruit to some Hill People in a New Deal relief program and they tried to fry them, too) eggs and bacon. The Ozark Plateau, you may have noticed as well, is no place to be a hog. Biscuits, to be measured with calipers, must be at least four inches thick and also must be able to float effortlessly just before serving. CJ’s and Francisco’s Country Kitchen both serve up biscuits and gravy like that.

The mental picture in the author of  Exodus had in mind when he coined the term “Promised Land.’

I think that’s the meal I’ll go for. Don’t tell Dr. Tackett, my cardiologist. She is, however, from Kentucky, where they eat the EXACT SAME STUFF. Dr. Tackett eats kale and might occasionally and accidentally smell a halibut if it’s served on a table at the opposite end of the restaurant. She is a much stronger person than I could ever hope to be.

My cardiologist, whom I both admire and adore.

Every once in awhile, breaking through all those Facebook posts from Cabo and Maui and Paris that make us question our own self-worth and our boring, pedestrian lives, a little truth gets posted.

A friend of mine is mentally ill, and his Facebook posts have no Margaritas, no white ribbons of beach, no banks of elms along the Seine with Notre Dame’s towers soaring just beyond.

My friend is in a hospital.

I emailed the hospital and asked if there’s anything I-—or we-—could do to help him. I don’t know that there is. I had to ask.

When I knew him almost fifty years ago, he was one of the finest young men I’d ever met. He impressed me so much with his integrity, his intellect and, underneath his shyness, his personal warmth. We grew up together in both high school and in the Episcopal Church, so that means a lot to me, too. The kind of young man he was-—the kind of person each of us once was, or the person that we hoped to be-—is something profound and deep and enduring. But it’s not unassailable.

We spend great parts of our lives, I think, under siege, rather than sipping Margaritas, fighting so hard just to survive that we never quite become the person we were going to be in our dreams. We get worn down. Sometimes, in our exhaustion, we lose faith in ourselves and we have to fight to get it, and ourselves, back again. Life is a war, constant and merciless, for so many of us.

My friend’s war may be the most frightening any of us has ever fought.

I know a little, and it’s a very little, about what he’s going through. So do many of the young people I’ve taught who fought their struggles so quietly but with so much courage.

I’ve been hospitalized several times in my life for depression—it killed my mother and twice almost killed me—and while the spectrum of our illnesses might be vastly different, the constant in both is the voice inside my head and inside my friend’s, insistent and seductive, that tells you lies about yourself, your self-worth, and about reality itself (it may be as menacing as the green fog in Eliot’s “Prufrock,” or, conversely, reality might be a kind of English garden, lavender-scented, where you are a barren stinking weed). That voice is a damnable liar.

It’s also cunningly persuasive—-the most persuasive when it makes the least sense—and it is powerful. It’s a voice that lies almost as much as Facebook.

So I’ve been crazy, too, and I wanted to say that in my friend’s defense. I also wanted to say that because it gives me an extra measure of responsibility toward him.

I am also a devout coward. I like mental hospitals and long-term care institutions only a little less than I liked bulls when I was a little boy, when, laden with fresh jolts of testosterone and adrenaline, they would look up at me from their grazing with suddenly murderous eyes. I get the same catch in my throat today when I see large men driving pickup trucks garnished with Confederate battle flags.

Fear’s the only thing that stops me trying to do something for my friend. I don’t know that seeing him would do any good, or even if his doctors would think it a good idea. Maybe it wouldn’t be a good idea for me.

But maybe it is.

Maybe anything we can do, even if it’s tollhouse cookies, is a good idea. Compassion is never a small gesture and, in the research and the writing I’ve done, it’s never rare, either, not even when the war is even more murderous than the one we fight inside ourselves, when it’s the kind of war young men fight to murder each other.

You’re right, by the way, if you think that this is none of my damn business and that I’m in way over my head. I agree with you completely. Maybe, and I’ve done this before, I am confusing myself with Jesus.

Maybe that’s exactly what He wants of me.

The photos above are of Churchill’s famous portrait (Cecil Beaton got the expression by reaching out and snatching the cigar out of Winston’s mouth) and of Trump visiting Blenheim Palace today.

Blenheim Palace was Churchill’s birthplace, named for the victory his ancestor, Marlborough, won in Bavaria, fighting for Queen Anne and for Britain in the War of the Spanish Succession, when the Bourbons aimed at disrupting the balance of power in a manner only slightly blunter than Putin’s. The intent, the malevolence, was otherwise the same.

Capability Brown’s work, Blenheim.

The palace is magnificent—-my wife, Elizabeth, and I have visited—but it’s the estate that’s even grounder, with the grounds so beautifully and carefully designed, yet with a seeming artlessness that gives hillsides and lakes and copses of trees the appearance of happy accidents, and all of it was executed by my favorite landscape architect, Capability Brown, a man I used to explain the Enlightenment, in visual language, during nineteen years of teaching history to the high-school sophomores I loved so much. Churchill proposed to Clementine in a neoclassic Greek temple recessed in Capability Brown’s shade, cast by trees that he hadn’t planted yet. He had faith that the shade would be there when it was required. That kind of faith leads to the imperfection we call “democracy.”

Temple of Diana, Blenheim.

The two men, Churchill and Trump, have much in common. Both had emotional lives that were stunted by neglectful mothers. Winston’s Jennie, a Philadelphian, resented his very birth, in a cloakroom, because his arrival made her miss a ball, and in revenge, she practiced premeditated and cruel neglect on her son until she discovered her love for him, finally, in the moment that he began winning elections.

Jennie Jerome Churchill

Trump’s mother grew ill when he was a toddler and she was so consumed with staying alive that he was, for several years, a virtual orphan.

As a result, both men grew up terribly insecure, petulant, self-centered, childish and given to bouts of anger that were frequently cruel. Both men were impatient with arcane bureaucracies and took cudgels to them, beating shortcuts through the red tape that often proved disastrous. The disasters resulted from their certainty that they were smarter than every expert summoned to counsel them.

Both men were racists: Churchill witnessed with satisfaction the salutary effect the Maxim Gun had on North Africans and he loathed Gandhi; Trump delights in making orphans by the hundreds, as long as they’re brown.

Both held forth interminably at social gatherings, impatient with the contributions of their guests because they interrupted the flow of their own brilliant monologues.

But only one of them was brilliant, and brilliant, most of all, in our language.

Only one of them was a statesman.

Only one of them instructed, elevated and inspired his people.

Only one of them studied history, understood it, after his fashion, and appreciated the depth of history’s lessons and used them to shape his decisions.

Only one of them was a patriot.

FDR and Churchill

Only one of them was a man so profoundly gifted, and so determined to use his gifts, that he was able to transcend his deepest and most grievous flaws. For Churchill, the most crippling flaw was the depression, the trait he shared with the one man he admired more than the Duke of Marlborough, and that was Lincoln–the Black Dog, he called it–that he fought, admittedly and in part with generous doses of brandy and champagne, but he found his steel in fighting it, in pushing it aside in every waking hour of his life.

Trump finds his steel–his is no stronger than tin– in insults and in cruelty. There is none of Churchill’s spine in the man. There is no man there at all.

Yet Trump was at Churchill’s ancestral home today. In keeping him away from London, in evoking Churchill’s birthplace, Her Majesty’s Government may have reminded us, deliberately or not, of Trump’s tragic smallness.

Trump is Shakespearean, but only in a minor key: He is Rosencrantz, or Guildenstern, or perhaps, in his best moments, Polonius. He is a character best dismissed offstage, behind an arras, where he can’t harm the plot.

But the same was said, and I’ve read the journalists who said it, about Mussolini and Hitler. They were, seemingly,  petit-bourgeois clowns, nearly as crude as Trump, yet they dragged the world down with them, and they made orphans from the Atlantic to the Urals. And then, having dispatched the parents, Hitler burned the orphans.

Where is our Churchill?  Where is the statesman with the talent to remind us all of our own greatness? That’s the faith, naive as it might seem, that Churchill kept and that Americans as diverse as Abigail Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Walt Whitman, Abraham Lincoln, Willa Cather, Dorothea Lange, Frank Capra, and Martin Luther King Jr. kept. It’s a faith I try so hard to summon in the little books I write. one that’s been validated in places as far away as Antietam and Cold Harbor, Papua New Guinea and Iwo Jima, Normandy and Berchtesgaden.

Exhausted 79th Division soldiers leave Le Haye du Puits, in Normandy, July 1944. One of them, local farmworker Domingo Martinez, was killed during the assault on this crossroads town.

It’s a faith that was lived by Army nurses who whispered gently and urgently into soldiers’ ears to keep them alive. It was a faith lived by the big Missouri farm boy, a B-17 waist gunner, who got his comrades out in their parachutes but went down with his bomber. It’s a faith that was  lived by the Japanese-American teenager, sent from Arroyo Grande to a desert concentration camp, who answered this insult by becoming an Army intelligence officer serving his country in the mountains of China: he won a Bronze Star, he won a Congressonal Medal of Freedom and he never came back to Arroyo Grande again. Until he died. He told his son, a Texan, to bring  his ashes home to Arroyo Grande, seventy years after the buses had taken him and his family and his friends away.

Arroyo Grande intelligence officer George Nakamura, dressed in a Chinese uniform, 1945. Nakamura disguised himself as a Chinese peasant to rescue an American flier behind Japanese lines and won both a Bronze Star and a battlefield promotion to lieutenant. He was twenty years old.

So where is our Churchill? Today reminded me that we don’t need him. We need ourselves. We need to remember who were are. There was Churchill’s genius: it was all in the reminding.

Churchill, with Ike, inspecting the newly-arrived GI’s of the 101st Airborne.

An excerpt from the book Central Coast Aviators in World War II.

*  *  *

Southern England, Spring 1944.

This royal throne of kings, this sceptred isle,
This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars
…This precious stone set in the silver sea
…This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England.

Shakespeare, King Richard II.

If there was a military historian with a gift close to Shakespeare’s, it was another Englishman named John Keegan. Keegan was a little boy in the English countryside, in Somerset, when the Americans began to arrive in their numbers in late 1943 and into the spring of 1944. Little English boys had lived for years with the deepest of privations—thanks, in large part, to the U- boat campaign that had nearly starved Shakespeare’s “sceptred isle” to death— and then the Americans came. They were, as Keegan later said in narrating a television history of the Great War in the pivotal spring of 1918, when he for once arrived at a loss for words, “…well, they were Americans.” By which he meant they were boisterous, cocky, well-fed, well- clothed, and, thank God, they were friendly, with an innocence and immediacy that was distinctly American. Their World War II counterparts taught English boys baseball and flirted with their big sisters, and married some of them, but most of them not, which meant that little boys Keegan’s age would inherit littler half- Yank nieces and nephews. Most of all, they were generous. There seemed to be no end to their Hershey bars (there wouldn’t be after the war, either, when, during the Berlin Airlift, one of bomber pilot Jess Milo McChesney’s comrades, Gail Halverson, air-dropped Hershey bars, floating on little parachutes, to the hungry children of blockaded Berlin) and no end to the rough affection for children that came with these big, loud men from across the sea.

GI’s introduce British war orphans to baseball.

And then they were gone. Keegan has vividly described the early-morning dark when that happened, when the chinaware and modest family crystal on every shelf in the Keegan home began protesting, rattling an alarm so loud that it woke the family up, if the motion beneath their beds hadn’t already made them sit bolt upright. The anxiety of Keegan’s family, and their neighbors, and of other families all across East Anglia, was relieved only when they went outside. Then anxiety gave way to wonder. They could feel in their breastbones the vibrations—“the grinding forced you to the ground,” Keegan remembered– of the engines of thousands of airplanes, but could see only dim red and amber lights in the sky, heading east, toward France. Some of the Americans Keegan had grown to love so quickly, his heroes, were on those airplanes, and tens of thousands of more, his heroes, were riding deathly pale on landing craft corkscrewing in foul Channel waters, and they were all headed for Normandy.

It was D-Day.

A GI introduces himself to two Norman children, 1944.

For the two years before D-Day, the Americans in England who had been carrying the brunt of their nation’s fight to Nazi Germany were the airmen of the Eighth Air Force. They made up 49 bomb groups and 22 fighter groups and their bases were 71 airfields concentrated in East Anglia, from Norfolk south to Essex, in places that must have sounded quaintly medieval to American ears: Bury St. Edmunds, Knettishall, Little Staughton, Matching Green, Molesworth, Snailsworth, Snetterton Heath, and Thorpe Abbots.

B-17s from the 398th Bomb Group prepare to take off on a combat mission, RAF Molesworth.

Bernard Shaw’s charming line about “two peoples separated by a common language” must have rung true, then, for young men, newcomers to England who’d ferried their bombers from Labrador (or for the luckier men, like Robert Abbey Dickson, who’d shipped out on Queen Mary, or future Cal Poly professor Richard Vane Jones, who’d made his trip on Queen Elizabeth.) Dickson’s luck held: when he first arrived in England, he was sent to the 381st Bomb Group, where he flew two orientation missions as a co-pilot. The 381st’s base was American-built, at Ridgewell, Essex, which meant that it had been built quickly in prefabricated stages by hard-working soldiers, black men, in army construction units. Bases like Ridgewell were marked by Quonset-hut barracks, each with a single, feeble, coal-burning stove, muddy streets, and mercilessly cold showers. But Dickson was quickly transferred to the 91st Bomb Group, based at RAF Bassingbourn, and the “RAF”—Royal Air Force—prefix made all the difference. An Eighth Air Force Base with the “RAF” designation had originally been built by the British, and, given Britons’ stubborn reluctance to give up their island, such bases had been built to last. Bassingbourn had paved streets and central heating. Dickson was delighted. It was, he remembered, almost like a country club compared to the 381st’s home base.

91st Bomb Group airmen serve Thanksgiving dinner to British children, 1944. The GI on the left is Joseph Running Bear, a Lakota soldier. Imperial War Museum.

Army food wasn’t country club fare. Bill Mauldin, the great cartoonist who created the imaginary Willie and Joe, his comrades in the Italian campaign, once remarked, without malice, that his mother was the worst cook in the world. Then he encountered army food, which was infinitely worse. At least airmen understood that they were fed better than men like Mauldin, dogfaces, who commonly used G.I. powdered lemonade to wash their socks. Still, even in the Army Air Forces, the green-hued powdered eggs, along with the ubiquitous Spam, were breakfast standards, and creamed chipped beef on toast—referred to as “shit on a shingle”– followed airmen across the Atlantic from the air bases stateside where they’d first encountered what seemed to be, to the military, a perverse culinary masterpiece. Radioman/gunner Albert Lee Findley Jr. found little relief off-base. “English food took some getting used to,” he admittted tactfully. (Many years after the war, Findley and his wife would live in England as the proprietors of an antique shop.) One vegetable, Brussels sprouts, was as common to English fare as Spam was to American mess halls, and, at war’s end, many English-based G.I.’s swore they would never eat them again.

An American St. Nicholas in Luxembourg, 1944.

There were other features of English culture that the Americans found more to their liking. Airmen almost immediately found pubs near their bases, and the attraction was powerful. Historian Donald Miller writes of the 1943 arrival of an AAF engineer battalion, charged with laying out an airstrip outside the village of Debach, near the North Sea. Their discovery of what English called “the local,” this one called The Dog, resulted in the Yanks buying so many rounds “for the house”—the last round, just before closing time, was for forty-seven drinks—that the next day, a doleful little sign was posted outside The Dog: “No beer.” It was, Miller notes, the first time the pub had been closed in 450 years. The Americans, of course, also found young English women to their liking, as well. The War Department discouraged what were called “special relationships,” and made it nearly impossible, thanks to a bureaucratic maze, for the best-intentioned American soldier to marry, but, of course, the War Department failed. “Special relationships” were as common as visits to the local pub. Al Spierling of Arroyo Grande, a B-17 flight engineer, lost a little of his youthful idealism—Spierling was a thoughful young man who made a special trip to York to explore the setting for Brönte’s Wuthering Heights— when he learned that a gunner he knew, a married man, had taken up with an English girl. He was a little shocked. “For a twenty-year-old,” he said, “I learned a lot.”

These two young Marines cared for this Okinawan orphan until family members were eventually found.

There was the other special relationship, the one historian Keegan remembered, and that was with English children. Airmen seemed to have great affection, just as other G.I.s did, for their smallest neighbors, and the affection was reciprocated. A typical sight at the beginning of any combat mission would be the children gathered at an airbase’s perimeter fence. They were there to wave goodbye to the crews as their big airplanes took off to reach their assembly points high above the English countryside.

Berlin, May 1945.

In April 1967, Robert Kennedy went into a shotgun shack in the Mississippi Delta and saw a malnourished toddler playing listlessly with grains of rice on the floor. He knelt down and put his head on the floor, his face at the child’s level, and talked to him softly. He stroked the baby’s cheek and his distended belly. (“He touched those children [on the Delta visit] as if they were his own,” a writer noted.) He got no response from the hungry baby. When he finally stood, after several minutes, his eyes were welling with tears.

A year later, when he ran for President, he could not keep a pair of cufflinks. Crowds surged around him, reaching out to touch him, propelled toward him by some primitive and powerful emotional urge they felt for him–perhaps they felt validated by him—-and so the cufflinks were invariably lost. When the people so desperate for Kennedy’s touch surrounded his car, a bodyguard—sometimes a Los Angeles Ram– had to grab him around the waist and hold on with all his strength to keep Kennedy in the car, to keep the crowd from absorbing him.

I think he was my favorite precisely because, as a young man, he was so vindictive and mean-spirited. He, the family’s savage runt, was Jack’s protector and enforcer, but with Jack dead, Robert had to find others to protect. He found them, forgotten and isolated,  and so found himself, re-invented himself, in moments when he was surrounded by children, both by his own and by the children he met in the Delta and in Appalachia. These were his children, too.

In the winter of 1937, Arroyo Grande’s Muriel Loomis Bennett learned that children in the “Okie” migrant camp on the Mesa (some of those Okies were from Vermont) were desperately sick in one of the wettest years of the decade. She was outraged and did something about it: She and her son, Gordon, drove up to the camp with pots of hot soup and piles of blankets.

She had the same understanding that Kennedy did. Those children were hers–and ours.